Technological Civilization: The Organized Trans-Human Murder of the Soul & Future of Mankind

 Technological Civilization: The Organized Trans-Human Murder of the Soul &
Future of Mankind
Crysolo Featherstone
24 October 2023
At some level, or advancement, of industrialization, at some point during the
progression of civilization, and certainly beyond the proceedings and
operations of industry, technology ceases to be neutral. If we are so
irreparably altered by the introduction, implementation, and universal
standardized usage of technology, that we are completely changed from our
previously natural state and biologically organic condition, then arguably,
technology is not at all neutral. In fact, if technology erases our memory, of
us having previously been, historically, anthropologically, sociologically,
culturally, spiritually, and otherwise significantly and profoundly different,
before the so-called industrial revolution, for instance of many, we would do

well to deduce that technology is not neutral. Because technological
civilization, its conglomerated machine-matrix, and cybernetic imperial
dominant culture, has reduced us to such an extent, as to deprive us of even
possessing the awareness of our reduction, namely by having no mnemonic
frame of reference from which to consider our previous state and condition,
and our current crisis and cataclysm, we can thoroughly conclude that
technological civilization is inherently prejudiced towards our ruination,
subjugation, and annihilation. While we might study the past, if we had the
time to do so, insofar as it involves pre-civilized life, we can only look into
such a subject through the lenses of abstraction, for we are so far detached
from the previous reality of a life that was lived as a primitive, and not as a
civilized human being, that we can hardly appreciate how we might return to
such a place. A place we have never before been to, at least not during this
lifetime, insofar as the possibility for more than one earthly incarnation is
possible.
When the technology was not integrated into our lives, and imposing
arbitrary and artificial prime directives upon us, we were one, particularly
human way, that was, arguably, immeasurably more ideal, preferable, and
natural, then the way we are now–the way we were forcibly transitioned into
being, without complete awareness and consent as to what was happening,
why it was happening, and the significance that such a change was occurring.
Technology has not only genetically and biologically modified us, without
bothering to consult, honor, or counsel us, or our free, informed, consensual
will. But technology has also spiritually, intellectually, and socially modified
us, in such fundamental and complex ways, that we are forbidden to know
our true individual self, let alone practice and be true to our true individual
self. It needs to be noted, modification does not mean improvement. In many

instances, to modify something, or someone, is unhealthy or disastrous for
the object, or target, of modification.
The solution for all problems that are directly, or indirectly, caused by
technology, is always, from the perspective of the civilization and dominant
culture, more, and more technology. To give evermore power to technology
to rule over us, and to dictate the terms of our existence, is not only
extremely foolish, it is suicidal. Technology destroys the ecosystems,
biological diversity of various sentient and intelligent lifeforms, and the
natural habitats of the same, perpetrating ecological disaster and catastrophe,
all to further propagate itself through the vehicle that serves as it’s host,
namely the very imperial civilization that spawned it. So then, technological
civilization destroys everything and everyone that it comes into contact with,
and will accept nothing less then complete domination over everything and
everyone, and full integration of everything and everyone into itself, as a
commodity to be exploited, as a resource to be extracted, utilized, and
consumed, as a source of fuel, power, or food. As a serf to toil for a pittance,
as a cog in the machine of progress to grind up everything and everyone in
the dominant culture of death, as a node to be activated on demand and on
command, in a expansive neuronal cloud network.
The intrusion and invasive anti-nature nature, and anti-social socialization of
technology in our lives, has made us unnaturally dependent upon the very
technology that has transformed us and altered us in fundamental and in
complex ways. The fact that the technology, that technological civilization
itself, did not give us a choice, in being irreparably changed, is also a positive
indication that technology is not at all neutral. Moreover, our freewill has
been fundamentally, megascopically, and ceaselessly, violated. Technology
imposes upon us, far more conditions and requirements, that we must adapt
to and abide by, then we, as human beings, are able to impose upon it. While

we might impose some limits on our own usage of, and interaction with,
technology, such personal preferences amount to no real choice, given the
ongoing technological revolution and perpetrated rebellion against nature,
against all of life, and against our inborn soul. We are still domesticated, we
are still colonized, we are still subjugated. We are still not free, and without
real choice. For instance, we could choose to not watch TV, or not own an
iPhone, and yet we are still forced to exist and endure in a techno-society
where the multitudes, who assimilate themselves by watching TV, and
integrating with their iPhone and various cybernetic activities, are making
contact with us, and thus impacting and effecting us, and mostly in bad ways,
all the time. In fact, most people do this while only marginally associating
with us, if even there is any surface communication and interaction at all. For
a profound insight into the dangers of the medium of television, which can
be, and should be, applied even more to iPhone’s and the medium of
cybernetic smart devices, I recommend the book, Four Arguments for the
Elimination of Television, written by Jerry Mander, published in 1978. His
main thesis is that television is so harmful to human health in both body and
mind, that it is not possible to reform the medium, and thus, TV should not
be used, let alone be the center of our lives. I would guess the same
argument(s) are applicable, and even more so, today, to smart phones and
concerning the social media and the like medium(s) and conglomerated
technology.
Another example, of a myriad, of how technology, and thus civilization, has
altered us, without us having the choice of being so changed, and making us
even more dependent, is the global positioning system (GPS) and (anti-social)
social media. The more people are dependent on GPS for directions, the
fewer people there are that will have the skill-set to read a map and compass
and travel confidently without the constant need to defer to their iPhone. For

one, this constant interruption, by way of the constant stimulation of the
technology, at the very least, shatters our concentration and what previously
was, before everyone had iPhone’s in their hands, a more or less, natural flow
of individual consciousness. In fact, the more people have an iPhone, the less
sense of direction people will have. The more time people spend in their
iPhone, the less they will talk to other people, including their friends and
family, face to face, in real life. The more people are dependant on social
media for social communication and human activity, the fewer people there
are that will have the know-how to properly interact and function socially, as
a human being.
But then, this is the whole point. Because the technology makes being a
human being impossible, no one remembers what it is like being a human,
behaving like a human, or what it means to be human. All human activity,
communication, and choice, is centered in technology, and revolves around,
technology. The same is, incidentally, true of money, which is married to
technology. The more money you have, the more freedom you can buy as a
higher lever bond-servant; the more money you have, the more choices you
have to choose from, to make. Why is, why does, not all human activity,
communication, and choice, centered in, revolve around, the heart? If it was,
would people go insane when they gave birth to their children in a place
other than where conception occurred? Could people go insane when they
whisked their children away from the place of their birth to some other
distant place, all in the name of money? Should people go insane when they
injected their infants with jibby-jabs under the deceptive guise of necessary
and mandatory regulatory guidelines? If our choices were heart-centered,
would people go insane when they send their children to be mass-assembly
line factory-produced members of society in the public education system for
12 years?

The correlation between technology, as an extension of civilization, and the
disruption and division of attention span and the ability for concentration, is
as glaring as both the disruption of the migratory routes of birds, and the
disappearance of countless birds. There use to be far more birds in the skies.
Now there are far more machines, more planes, more drones, carrying people
and things, from one location to another. Our so-called increased life
expectancy and quality of life, means, and demands, the destruction of the
earth, and the death of all species of life. How many countless species of
animal, insect, and plant life, has technological civilization cut horribly short,
so that it can become even more obese, morbidly cancerous, and profusely
greedy? Why is a human being’s cradle to grave experience declared infinity
more relevant, important, and valuable then that of, say, a bird, a bear, or of a
whale? Even if it were true, that humans were more valuable than all other
animals, does it then follow that all other animals must experience their lives
ruined and cut horribly short, does that then mean that all other animals
must suffer and be destroyed, all to propagate the valuation of humanity,
human belief, humanity activity, and human systems?
Are the bankers, entertainers, politicians, scientists, engineers, doctors,
experts of all sorts, sold on the lie that human civilization cannot exist
without destroying every other species of life in the process? By the way,
destroying every other species of life in the process IS the trajectory. That is
quite a fashion statement human zivilization is making.
A bird, a bear, a whale: whose amazing life is made extremely more difficult–
not by Mother Nature herself, but by the anti-nature nature, or narcissistic,
psychopathic pathology, of civilization and technology–and cut horribly
short, because of the civilization and technology that enables humans to rape
nature and the natural world so routinely, and in such ways, that humanity
has defied reality, and the natural parameters and confines thereof. But no

worries; you’re politically correct, even when you’re vociferously anti-“woke”,
which you can be because a few of us have actually crossed the Rubicon, at
terrible personal cost, that has permitted everyone, even our enemies, now, to
have a much wider, larger, and longer dialogue and discussion about some
serious shit that was prototypically restricted to the fringes, about virtually
anything and everything; and the ekonomy is stable, in fact for the initiated
and with privileged status and access, its booming, even during every dive it
makes and each downturn it takes. Oh, and you pay all your taxes and watch
football and baseball. Which essentially makes you, politically, and thus
economically, and hence, socially, and therefore conscientiously, correct.
That’s probably the most important of all. Society is the most diverse it has
every been, and it is also the most narcissist it has ever been. Everyone is
different in the same civilization, and everyone is always right even though
there are many times when everyone is all wrong.
And in defying reality, humanity has engineered a synthetic reality, which,
instead of harmonizing with nature, colonizes nature, and like a predator
parasite to the host, it uses her for its own immediate satisfaction and
temporary gain, which results in the lasting devastation and infinite loss of
ALL other nonhuman species of earth life. This objectification,
domestication, and commodification of nature and the natural world and
natural lifeforms thereof, is apparent in the very governments, corporations,
institutions, organizations, factories, manufacturing facilities, processes,
proceedings, apparatuses, modes, systems, and functions of civilization and
the technology it breeds and imposes on all life. This is evident in the cyclical
consumption of civilization, whereby things are made cheaply in mass
production to the point that it is more economically viable to buy a new
something, and throw the old one out like trash, then to have an old
something repaired or renewed.

The forced dependency on civilization and the technology of the same, is
made all the more cruel by the false ideology, particularly of conservative
republicans, but such can easily be bipartisan, that wrongly asserts the dogma
of personal responsibility, onto outliers, deviants, and targeted individuals of
civilization and technology, without the qualification of the, imposed and
enforced, sinister reality, that personal responsibility is outside of the context
of the civilization, and the technology of the same, and that makes personal
responsibility, literally impossible. One cannot be personally responsible for
one’s life, and for one’s life’s decisions, when one is forcibly enslaved,
controlled, changed, and even destroyed, by the very civilization, and
technology, one is forcibly, and quite physically, made dependent on. To
either work, as a slave, earning a minimum wage, in a menial job that one
hates, with and for people that one dislikes, as an alienated, isolated, and
marginalized individual, whose soul is ceaselessly besieged by hostile actors
and predators, or to refuse to work, and then to not make money and be
impoverished and starve, is hardly a free choice, and is hardly conducive to
one having the real ability and freedom to decide one’s own fate and
determine one’s own destiny.
The Russians, Romanians, or Spanish, could hardly be faulted for not taking
“personal responsibility” for their lives, and for the decisions of their lives, in
the context of the barbaric and diabolic communist invasion, occupation,
and colonization of their homelands, and the murder of many, if not most, of
their man-kin or fellow countrymen. When my present, is not the future of
my people, because the future of my people was murdered in the past, by a
murderer, or a horde of murderers, who now own the present, then how is it,
that I am to take personal responsibility for my life and the decisions of the
same, now, when I am forced to exist, reside, and endure, at present, in the
murderers’ idea of their future, AFTER, they have already murdered mine? If

I am awake, I hate the very idea of their future, let alone the reality of it, and
being a slave to it and in it, and wish to have absolutely nothing whatsoever
to do with it, and even long to be completely segregated and separated from
such.
And yet, I am made dependent on it, and have not the freedom, nor the
means by which to attain the freedom, to choose an alternative way, were an
alternative way to be available, which it is not. So-called freedom is given,
only insofar as I might choose to be a slightly, or profoundly, contrasting
slave. But slave I nonetheless remain. Be I diametrically opposed to my
previous 20 years of former slavery, or resigned to make peace with the loss
and waste and regret of such promise and luminescence: I am still a slave,
now more wise, now more adept at, and experienced in, adapting to the
master and mastery of civilization, technology, and the impossible demands
of the dominant culture and the cybernetic-machine-matrix thereof.
Having more engagement and interaction with the technology, then with
other people in real life, constitutes a profound alteration of the fundamental
nature of a human being, and the inherent purpose of being human. We were
created, and are meant, to be social beings. Technology deprives us of this,
our basic necessity, or one of them, and redefines what it means to be social,
and imposes upon us, the contextual framework and parameters, in which it
is acceptable, to be social and thus socially functioning. If we do not make use
of social media, if our waking in-real-life reality is not largely brought about
as a result of, and augmented by, so-called social media, we are deemed as
anti-social, and thus social deviants. The cruel and evil irony is that the
inherent totalitarian causal agency of the technology, which is a mirror
reflected image of the civilization as a conglomerated whole, and that of the
economy and scale of the same, is such that it’s so-called social media, and
the various platforms thereof, is anti-social, in that it has reduced natural

socialization and deconstructed authentic society, to the point that such has
been virtually replaced with a synthetic version that is trans-humanist in
design and scale, and thus, it is anti-human, and anti-reality. And hence,
technology, much in the same way as civilization, and Wall Street, is not at all
neutral.
In other words, the technology is changing people into cyborgs. If the iPhone
becomes an extension of a human being, to follow the trajectory of such
technological progression, would lead to the replacement of humanity with
robots. We already observe and witness this to a lesser extent with
automation. Robots assembling vehicles in manufacturing plants, automated
trucks and cars, automated teller machines at banks, automated service call
centers, artificial intelligence generated art, music, books, and movies.
But we also witness this in the destruction and deconstruction of the earth
and natural habitats. The strip-mining of the mountains of West Virginia are
a clear example of this. Entire mountains are literally destroyed and gutted
from inside out, to extract the coal. And the sight and part that is left, after
the last bit of black gold dust is taken from the earth, is a civilized-made
mountain, more of an unsightly mound, a landscaped construction site, than
anything else, that is not at all natural, in that every piece of earth that
remains, and in the place that it is left, was the result of human civilization
and technology and so-called progress. No part of the mountain remains
undisturbed, and then afterwards, no part of the remnant, no part of the
corpse of the mountain remains undistributed into synthetic place and
artificial position.
The same might be said of us, as individuals, or as a race, or nations, and
tribes of the same. The same could be said of the oceans. The micro-plasticity
of the oceans makes it impossible for countless marine life to survive, let

alone thrive. There is now more plastic in the ocean, by volume, then there
are phytoplankton. The acidification of the oceans, the rising temperature of
the oceans, the polluting, poisoning, and toxification of the oceans, reveals
that technological civilization has no interest at all in respecting, honoring,
defending, loving, and having a symbiotic relationship with the earth and all
the various, sacred and sanctified, diverse biological lifeforms of the earth.
No, humanity and the progression of human civilization is interested in only
one thing. Promoting itself and self-aggrandizement. The only cost it
considers is the immediate cost to itself. And that can usually be written off
by offsets and outsourcing. If it can gain right now, in this one moment,
which it can and does, it will foreclose upon the future of all of life on earth.
And on it goes.
The fact that we have been so fundamentally and complexly altered by
civilization, technology, mass society, the division of labor, and that we had
no say or choice in this change occurring, and that this change, and these
changes, were the direct and inevitable results of technology, and the
civilization that developed, made use of, and imposed and enforced such,
determines beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt, that technology is not
neutral. Technology is not neutral, and civilization is not neutral. Though this
is truth, most of the so-called civilized peoples will not merely apologize for
civilization, they will champion it, no matter what. Insofar as even if they
begrudgingly admitted civilization did something wrong, let alone is
continuously terribly wrong, the something that was wrong, whatever it was
begrudgingly admitted to being, provided the opportunity for civilized
peoples to do something about it, or to be arbitrary right. Such as recycling,
or signing a petition, or sharing someones short video on social media, that
serves as a moral encouragement and morale booster for all. But ultimately,
the prevailing attitude seems to be: “Yeah, everything is bad and is getting

even worse all the time. But there is nothing we can do about it, so we might
as well enjoy the ride and get as much out of it as we can, while the getting is
still good.” So even in the offering of token solutions, the psychology of the
civilized mind of mass society is narcissistic and abusive towards the most
weak and vulnerable, the most marginalized and exploited.
We now are forced to endure in a digital, cybernetic world, that is obsessed
with us, and that demands our attention, every waking moment. This means,
that whereas throughout most of the 20th century industrial civilization was
mechanical in its technical motions, now, post-industrial civilization’s
technical components are nearly virtually all electronically, or cybernetically,
wirelessly, and remotely, controlled.
Technologically, human beings have never been so interconnected; distance
or time is no obstacle regarding instant telecommunications. Even different
languages are easily translated by numerous apps. Yet never before, have
human beings been so disconnected and alienated, from each other, from
their own soul, and from the very source of all of creation. Allowing for no
barriers or borders, the leviathan of technology exponentially increases. The
trajectory of technology is the increased and expanded enslavement,
universal dependence, ruination, reduction, and deconstruction of mankind,
and his identity, his ethics, his morality, his ability to think, and decide, and
to be, critically, as a unique individual soul inhabiting a distinct body. The
more control that is ceded to technology, the more forcibly dependent we are
made on the technology. Even with strides in automation, which, we were
deceptively told, will only benefit humanity, we are not more free, but less
free, as a direct result of the technology. Performing less physically labor
intensive work provides the illusion of freedom, yet whatever time would
have been spent doing such, is simply transferred to something else which

keeps us in the vicious cycle of the diversity of enslavement. That we are
thinking far less, then we would otherwise, because of the technology, does
not mean we are more free, but that we are more enslaved to the technology.
Human beings are not even creating and building their own civilization,
society, and community. It is technology that is making the world, and
determining the future of the same. And the future is extremely bleak and
grim. In fact, we are literally facing a dystopian nightmare. Instead of serving
our fellow man, our kith and kin, we are serving technology which in turn
enslaves all and dictates the terms of all of existence.
When a corporation is centralized and organized in such a way as to
subjugate all the workers of that organization, then the technology
implemented by that corporation is inherently bias in favor of the purpose of
that organization, which is, above all else, to make money. To make money is
to grow the economy, to grow the economy is to expand the civilization. To
expand the civilization is to destroy the natural world and all of the
biologically diverse sentient lifeforms of the earth, in all of their wondrous
and respectful, and symbiotic habitats, ecologic formations and processes,
and unique and interconnected kingdoms.
The presupposition of post-modern, cybernetic civilization, is that, much in
the same way all children that are mandated to go thru the compulsory
schooling and education system, and “learn” the same things, in the same
way, at the same rate, and at the same age, all people, will be mandated to
experience, endure, and yes, suffer, the effects of technology, in the same way.
Clearly, both presuppositions are totally false and wrong. Children do not
learn in the same way and at the same pace. Some are more visually oriented,
some children are more hands-on, that is to say, instead of being lectured to
about what a forest is, and what sort of animals live in forests, while not
being anywhere near a forest, they will learn about a forest by being in a

 forest, by seeing it with their own eyes, by listening and hearing the sounds
of a forest with their own ears, by walking in the forest for themselves. In a
similar way, technology will effect people differently. I should qualify that
statement by saying: technology will adversely effect, people differently.
Although, overall, technology is not neutral, and so it will fundamentally
change all people. The fact that we do not have a choice, notwithstanding the
deceptive and synthetic nature of technology, is more evidence, albeit
circumstantial, that technology is not neutral. Incidentally, the intentional
and logical harm that the school inflicts upon children and the young, is
irreparable and life-long. For a truthful analysis of the public education and
compulsory school system, I recommend the book: Weapons of Mass
Instruction: A Schoolteacher’s Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory
Schooling, written by John Taylor Gatto, published 2010.
Technology is so omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient, that it imposes
its will, dictates the conditions and states of virtually every area of our lives
and each aspect of our existence, that we do not even have the choice to live
our lives without it. Much in the same way we do not have a choice to live our
lives without money, or with very little money, we do not have a choice, to
live our lives without technology, or with very little technology. Why is there
no alternative? Why is all universalism? Why is all collectivism? Does an
individual have no intrinsic value outside of the group hive-mind? Fathers
and mothers cannot even begin to hope, should they even have the desire to
begin with, which many of them will not, to positively influence their
children more then technology will immediately, or eventually and
ultimately, negatively influence their children. Once again, this indicates that
technology does not reside, nor hold citizenship status, in the state of
neutrality. If one does find technology in the state of neutrality, one should

verify its legal status, because it very well might be the case, that such
technology is an illegal alien.
The death-march progress of techno-illogical civilization directly results in
increases in the poisoning and polluting of the air, water, land, and food. The
progression of technological civilization means a bigger population, which
means more development, which means more over-development, which
means more destruction of the earth and the various biologically diverse
lifeforms of the earth, which means an even larger general population of the
technological civilization, which at the same time, means more suffering and
death, for both humans, and all non-human lifeforms as well.
The false duality of the left-right paradigm is to be avoided for the dangerous
snare that it is. The left is culturally Marxist, or communist, the right is
culturally conservative, or liberal. But the whole spectrum, including the socalled
moderates in between on both sides, accepts as a given, the
technological civilization and the economy, industry, and cyberneticmachine-
matrix thereof. The destruction of the earth and all viable life
thereof continues apace, unhindered, whilst the agenda of trans-humanism
continues apace, unhindered. There is no political solution to a problem that
is far bigger then the machine of politics, especially given that the machine of
politics of technological civilization is a big part of the problem. In fact, the
entire political establishment does not even address the problem, let alone
effort to try to solve it, but rather, it feeds the problem, and becomes part of
the problem, and even offers the problem as the solution. The fact that we
have no political representation should indicate to us that there is no political
solution to the problem. Also, we would do well to keep in mind, that we did
not create or cause the problem to begin with. Moreover, the fact that we are
denied the ability to belong to, and be a member of, a legitimate society, and
thus community, of course reveals that there is no social solution to the

problem, because the problem is a lot bigger than even the most wellbalanced,
purest, egalitarian society that we can only envisage in our mind, or
contemplate in some obscure passage in some fringe truth book, the only
copy of which will likely be a digital pdf tucked away in internet archive.
The fact is, technological civilization precludes, and violently forbids,
legitimate solutions, one such being so-called anarcho-primitivism, or even
anarcho-minimalism, from being offered, brought about, and practiced
Civilization, and its technology, domestication, and language, make it
impossible to return to a lifestyle of a hunter and gatherer. This is made all
the more cruel and evil, because civilization, and it’s technology,
domestication, and language, make trophy hunting, that is, the blood sport of
rich people murdering animals, including lions, for the fun of it, not only
possible, but an industrious experience and commercial, and thus financially
lucrative, venture. While they might not be trophy hunters, most hunter and
gatherers today, are completely civilized and are conformed to the
technological progress of civilization and absolutely committed to it, no
matter what. The world civilization, the cybernetic-machine-matrix thereof,
the dominant culture and conglomerated technological system thereof,
makes survival outside of and apart from it, virtually, literally, impossible.
This is done intentionally and by civilized design. Enter: organized religions
of the world.
Civilization offers itself, as a response to itself, cloaked as though it were its
own solution. Be it Catholicism, or Protestantism, or anything of the
heretical, blasphemous, anathema cult-sect derivatives and mutations
thereof, all of these are civilized organizations that have been spawned by
civilization itself, and take, as a given and for granted, the technology,
economy, and industry, and the cybernetic machine thereof, as a contingent
for, and of, its founding and genesis, as an immovable condition of, and for,

its continued existence and accomplishments, and for its future growth and
success. In short, for its place in the civilized world.
Any serious consideration at a solution, offered by the civilized religious
institutions of the world, is put on the individual, who is targeted by the
world, by the collective, civilized, organization. In other words, as critical as
we might be of civilization, civilized society, the technology, industry,
machinery, matrix, language, government, corporation of the same; at the
end of the day, we are the ones, we are told, by organized religion, who must
take responsibility and become and be better. All the while being slaves to
civilization and technology, and not free to even loosen the bounds which
prevent us from becoming and being our best selves. All the while the
civilization becomes and is worse and worse, and more hurtful, harmful, and
devastating to us, without so much as pretending to take responsibility for
the destruction that it is perpetrating and perpetuating. No worry, we are
told: after we die, if we believe correctly, we will live forever in paradise. But
if we refuse the belief system which was fabricated and provided by the
civilization, then after we die, we are spiritually terrorized into believing, we
will be tortured, and tormented, cut off from all goodness, and doomed
forever.
The cruel, masochistic, sadistic, evil irony and draconian mockery, is that the
organized religion of Christianity offers you something that you cannot even
be. In fact, Christianity informs you that if you do not become, what you
literally cannot be, then you will be doomed forever after you die, and you
will be tortured for all entirety. All organized religions impose conditions
upon being accepted by God and acceptable to Him. Can you imagine if the
local home owners association imposed multiple conditions, or even one
condition, as to how my own child will be acceptable to me, or how it is that I
will accept my own child in my own home? If I do not believe my mother

loves me, when in fact, in truth, she does love me, does my disbelieving that
she loves me prevent, or stop, or make into nonexistence her motherly love
for me? Of course not. Now, I might be pretty stupid, or otherwise messed
up, if I did not, or could not, bring myself to believe that my mother loves
me, but my not believing her loving me, does not make her not love me, and
so, does not make me not benefit from her love and from her loving me.
The problem with the Christian, is that he is the proverbial moody teenager,
who is idolized by the very same world he, sort of, kind of, intermittently, is
supposed to, hate, and rebel against, who thinks he’s invincible and knows it
all, who thinks he’s edgy and nonconformist, all whilst living in his dad’s
house, having no need to work and earn his own living to take care of
material necessities, all the while enjoying everything the world has to offer
him, including instructing him and giving him everything he needs to
successfully “rebel” against it.
So even though the fundamentalist Christians reduce the organized religion
down to one condition, that of faith, from which all dogmatic positions
spring forth, it is still one condition. In other words, it is a numbers game.
Essentially, Christians state: you can think, say, and do anything and
everything you want, or don’t want, but you must, absolutely must believe
that Jesus died for you and your sins, or He will not have died for you and
your sins, and so you will be doomed forever and tortured for eternity after
you die. True, free, legitimate love, does not put conditions, or even one
condition, on the subject that is loved. To universalize faith is to cheapen
faith. If I believe God loves me, but I have no faith in Jesus, does that mean
God does not love me, or that He will always love me, even though I will be
condemned to be doomed forever and tortured for all eternity? What then is
His love for me but vain, for He put a condition on me receiving His love, on
my benefiting from his love, and that, forever, no matter what. If I stop

 paying taxes, to a government that not only has not represented me,
legitimately or rightly, if at all, but has done irreparable harm to me, or has
allowed the same, does that then me, I have no legal right to use or avail
myself of government sources of information and services?
In the religious mythos, and the plagiarized contextualization of monotheism
and a singularly supreme Divine savior of mankind, there are theological
wrongs, and spiritual immoralities, that preclude certain highly intelligent
and creative souls from submitting to the worldly controlling powers that be,
that conform to the world, to it’s dominant culture, and it’s countless mutated
and splinter strains and variants thereof, where, and when, the most
intelligent people in the world, are quite literally, the stupidest, and in more
cases then will ever be publicized, the stupidest people, at least as defined as
such by the people of the world, are quite literally, the most intelligent
people in the world. I appreciate the quality of highly intelligent and creative
souls who are profoundly poor and incurably unlearned immeasurably more
than the “good education” of highly educated people who tire not of
expressing their own accolades and constantly affirming how good they are,
how good they have it, and thus how good it is for you to be graced by their
presence.
And yet, our kind, our true kith and kin, our like-brave-souled, like-purehearted,
like-light-minded folks, they are not permitted to exercise their
intelligence and creativity, to articulate their intelligence and creativity, to
share their intelligence and creativity, much in the same way, a killer whale is
not permitted to exercise her full range of bodily motion and function, not
permitted to travel the great distances in the ocean that it is her innate nature
and birth right to do, not permitted to communicate and to live in harmony
with her own kind without being accosted, encroached upon, molested,
attacked, captured, and killed, by a world less interested in intelligence, and

most interested, in all things that stupidity can purchase. What manner of
horrors must a way be forced to suffer, in order the she would intentionally
beach herself, being possessed of a rational intelligence high enough to know,
that such an action would inevitable mean the end of her life? Does the
United States Navy have any new information that will help answer this
question?
Putting aside, for a moment, the divinity of personage in the form of a man,
namely Jesus Christ, what was the humble beginning of the Christian
movement? It was one man, teaching people, who otherwise were excluded
from knowing how civilized society works, and the truth that was horded by
those learned men with specialized expertise and interests, such as the scribes
and pharisees. In other words, it was one man, who set people free by telling
them the truth. It was one man, helping people, where and when everyone
else, including the civilization overall, either refused to, or were otherwise
unable to. It was one man, wisely and courageously criticizing the power
structure, pointing out the evildoers and the wrongness of their ways. It was
one man, making disciples of whom he choose, of whom he knew, to carry
on his necessary and important work and legacy. It was one man, upsetting
the balance of power, not because he sought to rule, in a civilized, worldly, or
even earthly, sense, but because he was revealing that there is no solution to
the problem(s) of civilization, technology, industry, domestication,
corporation, and language that does not involve the individual creating
authentic reality even when he is forced into a position of social alienation,
even when the entire world generates a sinister reality with lies, and murder,
as, and at, its foundation, and even when that entire world, hypocritical as it
is, targets him, and vociferously and violently prefers the liar and the
murderer instead of him.

 So, over the course of time, civilization took Christianity unto and into itself,
and made it one of its countess corporeal bodies by which and thru which to
drive and control civilized humanity. Is that not what it does to our
individual souls? The fact that religions that are truly primitive, and that
have not been founded and generated as a result of, and thru, civilization, are
outlawed, reveals the tyrannical draconian measures that civilization
adamantly takes, to enslave the human will and the human spirit, preventing
the human from articulating his own unique and beautiful appreciations of
the sacredness, sanctity, and interconnections, of all of life, and the symbiotic
relationships of all of life weaved together in the fabric of creation.
Mass society, and the rampant and insatiable consumerism of mass society,
has the inherent effect of alienating the individual from his own soul, from
his own mind, and from his own identity as a unique self. All the while, mass
society, technology, and civilization generally, possess, and process, in phased
arrayed quantum entanglements, the individual soul. As the owner of a title
possesses a vehicle, so the corporate-government world possesses the
individual. In other words, mass consumer civilized society forcibly enslaves
the individual and alienates him from the source of light and interest that
gives rise and significance to the most fundamental questions of life. Namely:
Where did I come from? How did I get here? Why am I here? What am I to
do? Where am I going?
Even our parent-guardian names are legal fictions, arbitrarily picked and
assigned to us. If we have no say in our given name, what say do we have in
our destination or determination? What say do we have in the
predetermination and predestination of the truth, facts, and matters that are
of far more greater significance than the drab identifying title we are
assiduously appointed as an infant? That our name is not indistinguishable
from any other name is problematic and already less then desirable. Literally

thousands, tens of thousands, and even so many more, have the same name as
me and you. It is distressing to live up to a name that was arbitrarily picked
and given to us, that identifies the legal fiction version of us, but that has
virtually nothing to do with our actual, and legitimate, identity.
Notwithstanding that any document or form of identification, in terms of it
being a legal representation of our legal fiction, must have stated, our name,
and that in all capital letters, we have no legal representation. This of course
compounds the whole farce. Hi, I’m short-hand and this is two letters. How
utterly unoriginal and pathetic and foolish.
Technological civilization is not neutral. The organized trans-human murder
of the soul of man and the conspiracy to murder the future of mankind is
diabolic in intent and evil in practice. Call it any name you like, it still doesn’t
make it or you the truth or right. Call it by any name you like, it still doesn’t
make it or you the truth or right.
Perpetually treating the symptoms of the disease is not the equivalent to
curing the disease. If the disease is incurable, then the most the organization
can offer, and provide, to a diminished and limited extent, is some comfort
and the slight prolonging of the inevitable demise. But what if it was not so
much that anything was wrong with me, but what if the doctor was the
diseased one? And yet, I’m the one condemned to die a death, sooner, rather
then later, before my time? He wants me to believe he’s healthy, or I am sick,
or we’re both sick, or we’re all sick. And if we’re all sick, we all need the cure,
or at least the symptoms treated. What if I don’t believe there is such a
disease, or if there was, that I should at all be worried about it? What if I
don’t believe there is a cure, or if there is a cure, that I should not take it?
What if there was a disease, but I already had immunity for the disease, even
though I might suffer some of the symptoms of the disease, therefore I would
not have to take the cure?

In fact, what if I believed that by taking the cure, that might actually be more
harmful then helpful to me? Should I be doomed forever and tortured for all
of eternity for my faith, or unfaithfulness, in the contextual framework and
parameters, in the sparse decades I have spent in this hyper-multidimensional-
quantum-cybernetic-machine-artificial intelligenceconcentation-
gulag-death-camp-matrix? How can any faith, or faithlessness,
that comes about as a result of continual surveillance, intervention, and
molestation, be the legitimate creation, of truly and fully informed and free
will consent? If I am right, there is not nothing after death. That is a dumb
presumption by an ugly mind who spouts arrogant and darkened rational
acquirement’s in order to falsely satisfy the substance of totalitarian
obedience to the world, by way of submitting to the organized hypercritical
religion(s) of the world. , If I am right, after I die, there is everything.
And if I am wrong? God will understand me like no Christian, or non-
Christian can, or cares to, or would even remotely effort to, and will forgive
me my lack of faith. What, I am able to forgive the wrongs committed against
me by another, before, and after, they have died, but God is not so able, or
does not because it would go against His perfect and good character and
attributes? Oh ye of astronomically conditional faith and immovable acedia!
How I cannot abide your spiritual pride and intellectual arrogance. You have
an answer for everything. And yet, you give no solution(s) to the underlying
spiritual problems, that you yourself have not taken from someone else, who
has not taken from someone else, and so on, outside of the troublesome past,
dominant tradition, and unassailable dogma of your contrived convictions;
but you yourself, thrive in the here and now, unfettered by the very article of
faith, upon which is the conditionality of either an eternity in paradise, or an
eternity in doom. The problem with the Christian religion, like every other
organized religion, is that it is part of the world, and thus, part of the

problem, and yet it pretends it is separate from the world, which it cannot be
and is not, and offers itself as the solution and the only solution. Christianity
offers itself as the solution, and the only solution, yet it is predicated on
condition, and is thus a a spiritual dead-end. Part of the problem cannot be
the only solution.
That individuals who are not “saved” as you call it, are immeasurably more
persecuted by the world you serve, then you are, is very suspicious, given that
the world, at first sight, and last blush, appears to benefit more immensely
from you and your religion, then those who are targeted by the world, who
cling to the truth, and the light, even in the throes of lies and darkness,
without the luxury of a confirmation bias afforded to members of a group, or
any group, and those of a collective mind and conglomerated community
and systemic society. The display of power is not the same as the legitimacy
of authority. The need for spiritual freedom far outweighs the discretionary
and practical want for physical and social submission, conformity, and
acceptance, all of which is based on conditions imposed by human beings
within the context of organized religion which follows the precise same
industry and industrial standard and format of the very world from whence
spawned it. It is a little more curious, if a lot more than a little suspicious, that
one of the greatest civilizations of all time on earth, if not the greatest
civilization, namely that of Ancient Greece, that is, Hellen, which has long
ago ceased to exist, must share the name given to the worst place imaginable,
hell, which will last, as a place of eternal doom, forever.